HomeColumnDetermining the direction

Determining the direction

Determining the direction. In his address to the National Assembly on Wednesday, June 30, after the budgeting process for the next fiscal year was completed, Imran Khan’s announcement of Pakistan’s foreign policy priorities did not go against his expectations and expectations, even before he took office.

The United States is an outspoken critic of the military partnership and has expressed discontent. After three years in power, the external relations review and review process has slowed down. Why during the first two reigns can only be answered by observers. It is possible that Pakistan’s love for China will increase, so Imran Khan’s reaction is not surprising.

Even the slightest ambiguity about Pakistan’s relationship with the United States has been cleared. Giving permission to target Altaf Hussain, who now lives in London, is tantamount to drawing a line after the snake has been crossed.

Everyone knows that Pakistan is desperate for an end to war and peace in Afghanistan. I don’t even want an elected government after that. Then why suddenly the Prime Minister rumbled and the reason was not difficult to understand.

America’s breach of promises and deceit fended off Pakistan, and the ceremony that developed between India and the United States gave China the idea of ​​strengthening Pakistan. India and the United States have joined forces to unite China, and Pakistan has given priority to China in the direction of external relations. The change in direction doesn’t happen suddenly, but takes years.

In the context of the changing situation in the region on July 1, a military briefing that put the political and military leadership to one side was unusual. Recognizing an unseen danger requires determination, not emotion.

Clashes between Indian and Chinese troops at Ladakh and Doklam in the days of fear of the Pak-Indian confrontation over Kashmir and the battle for Dobdo not only eased the pressure on Pakistan but embarrassed India around the world as the United States itself did on the Indian side. Pakistan is relieved to be a strategic ally of China.

Those who see the C-Pac as an economic project are partly right, but the C-Pac is actually a defense project. He brought the two sides together. Now the loss of one country counts as the loss of both. There is clearly little evidence of war in any of the nuclear-armed states in South Asia.

There is no ambiguity in this. Pakistan changed its foreign policy and ended its decades-long dependence on the US, but not suddenly. As President, Asif Zardari began to change direction during his tenure. Now that the deal with Iran and diplomatic relations with China have been extended to the Kohar sector, the next government is also working on the same aspect, which is reflected in the bitterness of Imran Khan’s tone. Pakistan has shown sincerity towards terrorism. More than 75,000 people died when NATO heavy tankers destroyed highways and bridges. Experts estimate the damage to be more than 1 trillion. That was all, but despite the minor damage, instead of praising Pakistan’s steadfastness, counter accusations were made, and puppets like Hamid Karzai and Ashraf Ghani, who occupied Kabul, were also challenged by Dow Moore. Continue to blame Pakistan’s intentions and Pakistan’s During the Heart of Asia conference, Sartaj Aziz was held in a type of prison in Amritsar. Under these circumstances, it was impossible to remain steadfast in loyalty.

Pakistani security agent killed in attack on Salalah checkpoint. Attempts to discredit frontline allies in the war have continued, with American newspapers such as the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times reporting that drone strikes are government sanctions to plunge the country into political chaos. Despite the collaboration, an article published in the Miami Herald attempted to link Pakistan to terrorism and drugs. This is the culmination of doubts about Pakistan’s sincerity. The arms embargo forced frontline allies to adopt early alternatives, creating a stalemate in continued cooperation between the two countries.

This is not the first time that there have been diplomatic tensions between Pakistan and India. There have been situations in the past where diplomacy between the two countries was restricted. He will do this and pressure Modi to pull a one-sided move. Contrary to expectations, Trump offered both parties mediation which Pakistan accepted, but India rejected the US proposal. Instead of the result, Trump made an offer. Silence, which means that the United States is not interested in solving the old problems of South Asia, but in the pleasures of India.

The United States has advised Nawaz Sharif to remain calm and refrain from retaliatory bombardment, even in days of violent reactions to nuclear explosions and threats against Pakistan that do not affect Pakistan.

He felt the need to rethink this and change course.

In his address to the National Assembly on Wednesday, June 30, after the budgeting process for the next fiscal year was completed, Imran Khan’s announcement of Pakistan’s foreign policy priorities did not go against his expectations and expectations, even before he took office. The United States is an outspoken critic of the military partnership and has expressed discontent.

After three years in power, the external relations review and review process has slowed down. Why during the first two reigns can only be answered by observers. It is possible that Pakistan’s love for China will increase, so Imran Khan’s reaction is not surprising. Even the slightest ambiguity about Pakistan’s relationship with the United States has been cleared. Giving permission to target Altaf Hussain, who now lives in London, is tantamount to drawing a line after the snake has been crossed.

Everyone knows that Pakistan is desperate for an end to war and peace in Afghanistan. I don’t even want an elected government after that. Then why suddenly the Prime Minister rumbled and the reason was not difficult to understand.

State Department spokesman mourns the loss of seven Canadian-Canadian Pakistanis

America’s breach of promises and deceit fended off Pakistan, and the ceremony that developed between India and the United States gave China the idea of ​​strengthening Pakistan. India and the United States have joined forces to unite China, and Pakistan has given priority to China in the direction of external relations. The change in direction doesn’t happen suddenly, but takes years. In the context of the changing situation in the region on July 1, a military briefing that put the political and military leadership to one side was unusual. Recognizing an unseen danger requires determination, not emotion.

Prohibition ticking and then decision withdrawal, inner story is revealed

Clashes between Indian and Chinese troops at Ladakh and Doklam in the days of fear of the Pak-Indian confrontation over Kashmir and the battle for Dobdo not only eased the pressure on Pakistan but embarrassed India around the world as the United States itself did on the Indian side. Pakistan is relieved to be a strategic ally of China. Those who see the C-Pac as an economic project are partly right, but the C-Pac is actually a defense project. He brought the two sides together. Now the loss of one country counts as the loss of both. There is clearly little evidence of war in any of the nuclear-armed states in South Asia.

All Lahore liability courts have been transferred to the federal colony, a notice is issued

There is no ambiguity in this. Pakistan changed its foreign policy and ended its decades-long dependence on the US, but not suddenly. As President, Asif Zardari began to change direction during his tenure. Now that the deal with Iran and diplomatic relations with China have been extended to the Kohar sector, the next government is also working on the same aspect, which is reflected in the bitterness of Imran Khan’s tone.

 Pakistan has shown sincerity towards terrorism. More than 75,000 people died when NATO heavy tankers destroyed highways and bridges. Experts estimate the damage to be more than 1 trillion. That was all, but despite the minor damage, instead of praising Pakistan’s steadfastness, counter accusations were made, and puppets like Hamid Karzai and Ashraf Ghani, who occupied Kabul, were also challenged by Dow Moore. Continue to blame Pakistan’s intentions and Pakistan’s During the Heart of Asia conference, Sartaj Aziz was held in a type of prison in Amritsar. Under these circumstances, it was impossible to remain steadfast in loyalty.

The trial of Khawaja Asif’s fortunes has been postponed

Pakistani security forces killed in attack on Salalah checkpoint. Speaking of drone strikes, the former FATA, including the KP Bando Basti region and even Balochistan, have been targeted. The secret search for Osama bin Laden is a terrorist attack. Attempts to discredit front-line allies in the war continued with American newspapers such as the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times reporting that government-sanctioned drone strikes were aimed at plunging the country into political chaos.

Despite the collaboration, an article published in the Miami Herald attempted to link Pakistan to terrorism and drugs. This is the culmination of doubts about Pakistan’s sincerity. Pakistan may remain silent for some time, but the military training cooperation between the two countries is ending. The ban on weapons deliveries forced allies from the front to take an early alternative

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments